Reviewer Guidelines:
Scholastic has laid down the following guidelines for reviewers for the good outcome of the content. Articles submitted to Scholastic are subjected to double blinded peer review process in which both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous to each other. Scholastic believes that, thorough peer review process is a critical factor to yield immense quality literature to be published in the journal.
Reviewer’s assignments during peer review
Abbas AR Mohamed
Details: Abbas AR Mohamed
Ihor Hospodarsky
Details: Ihor Hospodarsky
NnodimJohnkennedy
Details: NnodimJohnkennedy
Manh Nguyen Huu
Details: Manh Nguyen Huu
Hema
Its good experience to work SCMS journal. All the best for your upcoming isuues.
Sahar Elnour
I had an excellent experience with Scholastic Open Access Journals for the submission and publication of 3 of my articles. Their professionalism and efficiency truly stood out.
The entire process was swift and seamless. After submitting my manuscript, I received detailed feedback from the editorial team within just two weeks. The publication itself was completed in under a month, which exceeded my expectations compared to other journals.
The publication fees were very reasonable, especially for an open-access journal. Scholastic Open Access Journals was upfront about the costs, and there were no hidden charges along the way. For the level of service and exposure, the pricing is more than fair.
The support team was incredibly responsive and helpful. They guided me through the submission process and were always quick to answer my questions. Their communication was clear, timely, and professional throughout.
I was impressed by the high-quality editorial services. The peer review feedback was insightful and constructive, helping me improve my manuscript. The final published article was well-formatted and looked very professional.
Overall, I highly recommend Scholastic Open Access Journals for anyone looking for a quick, affordable, and high-quality open-access publishing experience!