Download Cover Letter Template Download Article Template

Scholastic Case Reports
(ISSN: 3108-1827)



Research Article
Volume 2 Issue 2 February 2026

Epidemiological and Clinicobiological aspects of Sarcoidosis (Experience of the Internal Medicine Department/CAH)

A. Brahimi and M. Saadouki

Internal Medicine Department/CHA) Dr Mohammed Seghir Nekkache; Algiers. Algeria

Corresponding Author: A. Brahimi, M. Sadouki, Internal Medicine Department/CHA) Dr Mohammed Seghir Nekkache; Algiers. Algeria.

Received: January 29, 2026; Published: February 10, 2026



Abstract

Introduction: Sarcoidosis, or BBS (Besnier-Boeck-Schaumann disease), is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by the formation of non-caseating epithelioid granulomas in the affected organs. A heterogeneous disease, its clinical manifestations are protean, with a predilection for the respiratory system. None of the clinical or paraclinical features of sarcoidosis is specific on its own. The diagnosis relies on a combination of positive findings: clinical manifestations and histopathological lesions after exclusion of other known causes of tuberculoid granuloma.
Objectives: Our main objective was to describe the epidemiological, clinical and biological characteristics of patients with sarcoidosis in an Algerian cohort.
Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, descriptive study using electronic records of patients hospitalized in the internal medicine department of the central army hospital between January 2017 and December 2023, which included 29 adult patients with sarcoidosis.
Results: The mean age of our patients was 50.6 ± 13.47 years, with a female predominance (male-to-female ratio = 0.38). The majority of our patients (72%) had superficial and/or deep lymphadenopathy; hepatomegaly (31%); dyspnea (31%); and cough (27%). The chronic form was predominant (93%), with the mediastinal-pulmonary form being the most frequent (14%). There were 3 cases of severe localization (2/29 neurological and 1/29 cardiac). An inflammatory syndrome was present in 52% of cases, and biopsy with histopathological examination was performed and contributed to the diagnosis in 83% of cases.
Conclusion: A ubiquitous disease, characterized by geographic and ethnic epidemiological variability (in the absence of local data); of enigmatic etiopathogenesis. Its clinical polymorphism has earned it the name “The Great Mimicker,” with limited biological contribution making the development of diagnostic criteria difficult; diagnosis is based on a suggestive clinical and radiological presentation, with, in most cases the demonstration of an epithelioid granuloma without caseous necrosis.
Key words: Sarcoidosis, granuloma, granulomatosis, epidemiology.

References

  1. Chapelon-Abric and al -(2004). Epidemiology of sarcoidosis and its genetic and environmental risk factors. The Journal of Internal Medicine 25: 494–500.
  2. BA, Maliarik MJ, Major M, Popovich J, Iannuzzi MC (1998). Epidemiology, demographics and genetics
  3. of sarcoidosis. Sem Respir Infect 13:166–73.
  4. Judson MA, and al. Sarcoidosis; Clinical Respiratory Medicine 1188-1208 (2016).
  5. James DG (1992). Epidemiology of sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis 9:79–87.
  6. Forsen KO, Milman N, Pietinalho A, Selroos O (1992). Sarcoidosis in the Nordic Countries 1950– 1987. Sarcoidosis 9 :140–1.
  7. HosadaY, HiragaY (1976). A cooperative study of sarcoidosis in Asia and Africa: analytic epidemiology. Ann NY AcadSci 278:355–67.
  8. Hillerdal and al (1984). Sarcoidosis. Epidemiology and prognosis. A 15-year european study. Am RevRespir Dis 130:29–32.
  9. Elizabeth V. Arkema1 and al (2016). Sarcoidosis incidence and prevalence: a nationwide register-based assessment in Sweden Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 1690–1699.
  10. Duchemann and al (2017). Prevalence and incidence of interstitial lung diseases in a multi-ethnic county of Greater Paris Eur Respir J; 50: 1602419
  11. Marios Rossides and al (2023). Sarcoidosis: Epidemiology and clinical insights. The Journal of Internal Medicine Journal of Internal Medicine 0; 1–13
  12. Beghè and al (2017). Sarcoidosis in an Italian province. Prevalence and environmental risk factors
  13. MG. Sikjær and al, Sarcoidosis: A nationwide registry-based study of incidence, prevalence and diagnostic work-up, Respiratory Medicine.
  14. H. Jeon, T. Kang and al. The incidence, comorbidity and mortality of sarcoidosis in Korea,
  15. 2008-2015: a nationwide population-based study. Sarcoidosis vasculitis and diffuse lung diseases 2020; 37 (1); 24-36.
  16. Gorsane and al (2022). Renal involvement in sarcoidosis: Prognostic and predictive factors Author links open overlay panel, Néphrologie & Thérapeutique Volume 18, Issue 1, February, Pages 52-58
  17. Zammouri and al (2019). Tubulointerstitial Nephritis due to Sarcoidosis: Clinical, Laboratory, and Histological Features and Outcome in a Cohort of 24 Patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 30(6): 1276-1284
  18. Rastelli and al (2021). Renal involvement in sarcoidosis: histological patterns and prognosis, an Italian survey sarcoidosis vasculitis and diffuse lung diseases 38 (3); e2021017
  19. Kamata and al (2018). Clinical characteristics of biopsy-proven renal sarcoidosis in Japan; sarcoidosis vasculitis and diffuse lung diseases 35: 252-260
  20. Löffler and al (2015). Renal sarcoidosis: epidemiological and follow-up data in a cohort of 27 patients Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 31(4): 306-15.

Citation: Dr. Pravin Bhos., et al. “Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Submandibular Gland: A Case Report”. Scholastic Case Reports 2.2 (2026): 01-05.

 Testimonials

Abbas AR Mohamed

Details: Abbas AR Mohamed

Ihor Hospodarsky

Details: Ihor Hospodarsky

NnodimJohnkennedy

Details: NnodimJohnkennedy

Manh Nguyen Huu

Details: Manh Nguyen Huu

Hema

Its good experience to work SCMS journal. All the best for your upcoming isuues.

Sahar Elnour

I had an excellent experience with Scholastic Open Access Journals for the submission and publication of 3 of my articles. Their professionalism and efficiency truly stood out.

The entire process was swift and seamless. After submitting my manuscript, I received detailed feedback from the editorial team within just two weeks. The publication itself was completed in under a month, which exceeded my expectations compared to other journals.

The publication fees were very reasonable, especially for an open-access journal. Scholastic Open Access Journals was upfront about the costs, and there were no hidden charges along the way. For the level of service and exposure, the pricing is more than fair.

 The support team was incredibly responsive and helpful. They guided me through the submission process and were always quick to answer my questions. Their communication was clear, timely, and professional throughout.

I was impressed by the high-quality editorial services. The peer review feedback was insightful and constructive, helping me improve my manuscript. The final published article was well-formatted and looked very professional.

Overall, I highly recommend Scholastic Open Access Journals for anyone looking for a quick, affordable, and high-quality open-access publishing experience!